The magazine of the Melbourne PC User Group
What We Might Have Done...
Gordon Woolf |
|
Looking back on almost 20 years of desktop publishing produces evidence of ambitious claims, and some
strange byways which were presented as "the Future". It was not quite the smooth transition of history
that some would have us believe, even at this short time in the future.
Typesetting changed from hot metal in the 1950s with the introduction of phototypesetting systems
controlled by a unit with a computer terminal. It was equipment that no individual could afford, but
it was far cheaper than that which went before. However, while hot metal Linotypes could cope with 100
years of heavy use, the phototypesetting systems had a history in total of less than half that time,
and were "black box" systems, produced exclusively for the print industry.
Even when John Warnock and Charles Geschke, the creators of PostScript, started Adobe Systems, they still
saw themselves producing a complete package, with the system integrated with laser printing machinery.
But three months after they started, according to John Warnock in a 1985 interview, they realised that
the days of the big machines could be ending. The pair realised that "all the major computer companies
were interested in laser printing" and that while they were all trying to integrate the text and the
graphics, they weren't having a great deal of luck." He added: "Our company knew how to do that."
|

Many of the old office names were in the forefront when
it came to desktop publishing. For example, Remington
had this "integrated workstation for electronic publishing"
which could "combine several types of information - text, tables, graphs and drawings — into a single
document".
It ran UNIX and was a snip at $33,000, or $45,000 with
a LaserWriter. It had trouble with point sizes over 24pt...
but it did have a mouse. |

Need something to get pictures on to the page? In
1985 the Datacopy 920 "Integrated Imaging System"
could have been the answer — 200dpi output for around
$4000 (that's US dollars!) but it did come with the WIPS
image editing program, though the WIPS Planner page
makeup program to run on a PC was an extra $1500. |
But he also saw that the real breakthrough was when Mergenthaler and Adobe agreed that the Linotronic
film typeset-ting machines would be compatible with the "ultra cheap" 300 dpi Apple Laser-Writer (itself
made possible when Canon dropped the price of their CX laser engine which was inside it). The LaserWriter
cost about US$7000, but compare that to the first laser printer, from Xerox, which, in 1978, cost US$500,000.
One of the new "cheap" laser printers was advertised with the headline
"Say goodbye to Dot and Daisy..."
1985 saw the first issue of the US magazine "Desktop Publishing" which forecast the setting up of
"typesetting centers" where "anyone could walk in with a floppy disk and get quality typesetting done".
It also wondered about the relative merits of PostScript and its competitor, Interpress from Xerox, and
whether both could be left behind by the promised new product from Apple, QuickDraw, which "could divide
a pixel into 65,000 locations".
Paul Brainerd, president of Aldus, was quoted as saying that Arthur Young, the then huge accounting and
financial firm, had 16 newsletters produced out of their New York office costing US$150,000 a year in
typesetting and pasteup. "Two of them are now published with PageMaker and the others will convert during
the rest of this year. They can pay for their equipment and software in three to four months" said Brainerd.
(Shades of the current debates over PC/Mac and InDesign/QuarkXpress usage at ACP).
At this time, PageMaker was the top-of-the-range package but even it offered only discretionary hyphenation,
which meant you had to tell the program where it could hyphenate each word. Computer-assisted hyphenation
was promised in the next version. Kerning was also in the future, though the downmarket MacPublisher offered
limited manual kerning. At that time, just 17 years ago, all the major firms producing desktop publishing
software agreed that it would still be necessary for Apple to get behind the desktop publishing phenomenon
as it was "an application that only the Mac could perform with ease."
|

When standards changed in 1987, a Sydney firm advertised that you
didn't have to rush out and buy a
new $5000 PC. Instead you could
buy their external 3½-inch disk
drive for $775 and just plug it in
to get the benefits of a 730kb disk
drive. |

When flatbed scanners were expensive, you could always buy a hand
scanner
— and perhaps devise some means of using rules, books or blocks of wood to keep them on
track as you wrapped
your hand around them and pulled
them across the artwork. A colour
version could cost considerably more
than basic flatbeds today, and they
usually came with software to stitch
two or more scans together. |

The Apple LaserWriter, manufactured in 1984 came supplied with a
serial cable connection for the PC. During magazine production each page was printed separately
and then photographed
by a print shop to create the negatives
for plate making. It had 1 MB of memory and if a page contained both graphics
and text, as they do, the page would
often have to be run through twice,
printing text and graphic separately. |
PageMaker for the PC did not appear until 1986, the same year that Microsoft launched Windows, and
PageMaker included a runtime version of Windows (which meant you got a free copy of this new Windows
program with PageMaker; when you launched PageMaker from DOS, Windows opened first, then PageMaker
within it, though you had to buy a separate copy of Windows to run other programs).
In 1985, the top of the range program on the PC had been Ventura Publisher which would run on a PC XT
or AT or compatible, though it required 512 KB of memory and needed a hard disk of some kind. It worked
within the GEM (Graphics Environment Manager) from Digital Research which, according to a magazine of the
day "lets the PC behave like a Macintosh". The same magazine also said that Ventura worked best with a
mouse.
Ventura offered advanced features such as a "Big First Char", that some other programs are still having
trouble with. It could also use up to eight colours in each file. It could even sort out widows and orphans
(those last short lines of paragraphs at the top of a page, or first line of a para at the bottom of a page),
and it offered multiple columns with automatic balancing of columns (yes, this was 1985!)
Incidentally, the first edition of Windows was supposed to run on a PC with two floppy disks, but a magazine
review at the time stated "we strongly recommend a hard disk". It also needed "all the memory you can get
- 640 KB".
Memory of course was a problem even then, solved by several companies with boards to plug into the PC and
control the input and output of memory hungry things such as scanned images and files to print. President
Computers made much of their "Desktop Page Composition System" with its "Megabuffer Board". However another
firm's "Disk Doubler" board, advertised at various prices from under $300 to over $500, had a few problems;
many could not get it to work at all, and they were the lucky ones, for those who did found that it trashed
their hard drive. The manufacturer went broke.
A long established company in the printing equipment industry brought out a new system in which it made
much of the resolution being "90,000 dots per square inch" - which is precisely 300 dpi measured linearly.
And one of the distributors of PageMaker here in Australia, SCA, were taking two-page advertisements to
state that with PageMaker and a "Microtek Intelligent Image Scanner", "you could be the next Rupert
Murdoch".
The magazines of the time promoting desktop publishing (I could not find any references to "DTP" until
early 1987), include many advertisements that are unbelievably bad. I suppose they were good examples of
what can be done on a dot matrix printer.
|

To get stories into your publication, you might need a
modem, such as this acoustic coupler. It enabled you to
make a call, then push the phone handpiece into the
rubber coupler -- and I can vouch for it even working
in phone boxes (though I did have trouble getting a long enough
power cord to get my "transportable"
computer
to reach to the phonebox from the caravan park at one
place on the Nullabor). |

Even in the early 1990s, getting connected to the Internet required
a manual of several hundred pages, including a 6-page list of commands. It included details of how
to
connect Australia-wide via packet switching and you could
send an email to a fax number. But in comparison to
private networks such as The Australian Beginning of
10 years earlier, it was dead simple.
|
In 1987 things were moving in other parts of the world - a US magazine told how the kingdom of Bhutan in
the Himalayas had a newspaper produced by Buddhist monks using PageMaker with three Macs and a Laserwriter;
a second Laserwriter was on standby because the nearest service centre was in Singapore. They were, at an
altitude of 8100 feet, just 100 feet short of the limit at which it was claimed laser printers could work
at all.
Tax is always a problem with new technology, so it should be no surprise that the US State of California
was quick to decide that the output of laser printers at service bureaus would be tax free -unless they
had a graphic, in which case they would be liable for tax at 6 percent.
There was also a peculiarity with some laser printers that different fonts were used for vertical and
horizontal printing. It was supposedly handled seamlessly. The early LaserJet was an example, and it also
offered to print graphics at 300 dpi, unless the graphics totalled more than half a page, in which case the
resolution dropped to 150 dpi.
By 1990 for example, the competition for the DTP market was really getting intense, and a survey concluded
that one needed "at least a processor operating at 8 MHz" and at least a 20 MB hard disk.
In page makeup packages, the choice included "Newsmaster", which could offer "multiple pages in a single
document", included 30 fonts and could print to any of 175 dot matrix printers, while "Publish It!" had
text which rewraps "intuitively" around graphics.
However, if you could afford a Mac with two 800 KB floppies, you could now get Quark XPress which was
described as seeming "to have taken the best features from other leading packages" and combined these
with a few new ideas of its own. It cost $1750 in Australia.
At the same time Xerox Ventura Publisher was up to version 2.0 and needed MS-DOS or PC-DOS, 640 KB memory
and a 10 MB hard disk, while PageMaker was at version 3 for Mac, PC and even OS/2. The advantage for the
latter operating system was that you could have more than one document open at the same time, and could
cut and paste between them. PageMaker for the Mac had an "extension" that allowed one to work in colour,
and "for more sophisticated publications, users could print colour separations of their Colour Extension
files using Aldus Separator.
Also around at the same time were Design Studio, Ready,Set,Go!, First Publisher, Gem Desktop Publisher,
Pagework, and Ragtime.
There was also a challenger from Microsoft: Typographer. Strangely, for today's world, it ran only on the
Mac, and it offered a kind of hyphenation, but it wasn't automatic.
Among claims in other equipment was a scanner "which can scan an A4 page in 45 seconds" at 400 dpi, while
you could buy the "awesome power" of the Barneyscan 35mm transparency scanner for $16,500.
In printers, a few that printed at 600 dpi were beginning to appear - and QMS offered a tabloid laser
printer with PostScript and four resident fonts at $53,019 "excluding tax".
But in comparison to what had gone before, this period was the breakthrough. No longer did publishing
involve an engineering works and an investment spread over decades. Even accountants could see that the few tens of thousands involved in computer, scanner, laser printer and software, could be recouped over the cost of the old way of doing things within a matter of months.
The Desktop Publishing revolution was under way.
Reprinted from the November 2002 issue of PC Update, the magazine of Melbourne PC User Group, Australia
|