The magazine of the Melbourne PC User Group
E-Waste, Recycling and Responsibility
Michael Mullerworth |
|
|
Michael Mullerworth discusses the problem and challenges Melb PC members to
think how they might assist in finding a Solution |
New technology is marvellous, and we all wish for better appliances and
gadgets, but where do such products go when no longer needed? Old and unwanted
computers are one of the fastest-growing and most toxic forms of waste.
Electronic waste or E-Waste includes computers, monitors, and peripherals, as
well as TVs, mobile phones, MP3 players and other electronic devices. Currently
around three million computers are sold each year in Australia. In the same
period about one million others become redundant. Almost three-quarters of the
rejects (732,000) end up being dumped in the ground. The ACT is the only
Australian State that bans computer waste from landfill.
Burial Is Not a Solution
E-Waste graveyards are toxic time-bombs containing heavy metals and other
dangerous substances. Computer systems contribute 70% of the lead, cadmium and
mercury found in rubbish tips. Each CRT monitor contains over 2 kg of lead. Many
plastic computer parts contain brominated flame retardants which can vapourise
and be inhaled (this can also happen in computer assembly and recycling plants).
Incineration of the waste will spread these as fumes as well as producing toxic
ash. Rain and recovery treatments such as leaching with acids wash toxic waste
into watercourses or groundwater.
Consumer Expectations
The more material goods we acquire, the more we have to throw away. There is an
expectation that someone else will remove it as well as take over our
responsibilities. Computers and monitors are mostly discarded as hard rubbish
for municipal kerbside collection. In some cases items may be donated to a
specific worthy cause, but often it is an excuse to get rid of it, leaving
someone else with the responsibility of sorting, cleaning, refurbishing, and
finally disposing of the items.
Is Recycling the Answer?
Recycling and Refurbishment programs alone cannot deal with the problem of
obsolete computers. The scale of the waste problem is too large. In Victoria it
is estimated that over 180,000 computers are dumped in landfill annually.
Recycling and refurbishment costs are high and are not yet covered by taxes or
levies, and in many instances are subsidised by volunteer labour and training
programs. Effective recycling programs need to be financed and supported by
contributions from government, industry, and users.
Recycling in the strict sense is salvage, recovering as much of the raw material
as possible for re-use. New equipment is now so cheap and plentiful that
replacements may be made every 2-3 years, so the volume of waste increases. What
is not recycled goes to landfill or is exported as hazardous waste for
processing elsewhere, because the local cost of such processing exceeds the
value of any
recovered materials. It is common practice to export E-Waste to other countries
for recycling using cheap labour. This simply transfers the problem there, often
making it worse as safe practices may not be followed.
Refurbishment or Remanufacturing is
renewing old equipment so that it is re-usable. However, as people generally
prefer a new or recent model, they do not really want the outdated computer
being sold or given to them. This applies equally to overseas aid agencies and
to disadvantaged persons in our own community. Much "donated" computerware is
too obsolete or nonfunctioning, suitable only for salvage. In addition, software
installed on the refurbished computer must be "legal" or "open source".
Donate and Feel Good!
Refurbishment extends the useful life of the computer, and believing the
computer has gone to a worthy cause makes one feel good. For many people this
represents the limit of their concern. There is value in providing refurbished
computers (at little or no cost) to local not-for-profit organisations and
deserving individuals. But whether such gifts to foreign countries are always
useful is debatable. Consider the lack of technical support available there, and
anticipated difficulties with stable electricity supply and maintenance. It is
difficult or impossible to find out if any of these overseas programs has been
evaluated, so the benefit to the end-user is very unclear. What is certain is
that we have shifted part of the waste problem elsewhere, and done very little
to address the problem at home.
Responsibility
So who is responsible for E-Waste disposal? Government, Industry or Users? It
would appear that a combined approach is required, a sharing of responsibility.
Certainly government regulation and industry incentives are needed, but so too
is user involvement through education and publicity.
Government
At present the burden of dealing with E-Waste falls mostly on local government
councils, who cart it to landfill. At the urging of environment groups and in
response to public opinion, governments have exerted pressure on manufacturers
and distributors to assume responsibility by enacting take-back legislation,
especially in Europe and Japan (also in China), or by encouraging voluntary
initiatives. In five years, 30 countries will have take-back laws for
electronics; Australia has no such law.
But establishing manufacturers' responsibility is difficult except with
brand-name products and large companies, as components are sourced very widely,
and some manufacturers go out of business and cannot be made accountable. Some
countries are setting stricter standards for hazardous material content in the
finished article. From July 2006, the European Union will ban imports of
products containing prohibited materials. The new standards include lead-free
computers.
Industry
Voluntary action with some incentives is currently preferred in Australia,
modelled on the concept of Extended Product Responsibility (EPR ). A cradle to
grave scheme or Life Cycle Plan puts the whole responsibility on the makers, and
understandably is unpopular with them. It means the establishment of a mechanism
to take back or arrange for the re-use or disposal of the product when it is
discarded or replaced (in practice, by supporting recycling and refurbishment
schemes either directly as individual companies, or collectively as a group of
manufacturers).
Thus Product Stewardship Associations (PSAs) have been formed in
many industries, including the mobile phone industry. Some major computer
manufacturers have their own take-back schemes and support recycling, but the
details of final disposal are unclear. New technology is part of the answer:
better design
and safer, more easily recyclable materials are to be used in new products, and
companies will have to comply with the new standards being set by governments.
Users
Should not users accept a share of the responsibility, in much the same way as
they do, or should do, with household rubbish? This could range from delaying
unnecessary purchases of new systems to agreeing to pay a premium (like a
surcharge or tax) on new equipment sales which would be used to help finance
recycling schemes. At the very least, responsible dumping of the waste is
necessary, and for this to happen local collection systems are needed to
encourage take-up by the public.
One such initiative is ByteBack, a pilot scheme to collect and recycle computer
waste. It was started in the City of Boroondara on 27 June 2005 specifically to
divert such waste from landfill. The Waste Manager at Boroondara City Council
noticed that the annual hard rubbish collection contained a lot of computer
waste, and as the City of Boroondara has a high level of computer ownership
(confirmed in Australian Bureau of Statistics figures), it seemed a good
opportunity to start something. EcoRecycle Victoria, Sims E-Recycling,
Hewlett-Packard and K&S Environmental joined in to start the first joint
government-private computer recycling project in Victoria.
It is free to the user, being supported by financial and service contributions
from all the venture partners. It does require the user to do the right thing.
The items must be deposited in the collection bins at the Waste Transfer
Station, putting the onus on users to make the effort. Currently it is clearing
5 tonnes of computer waste a week of which over 90% is recycled.
Note: The following items are not accepted: Joysticks, play stations, electronic
games, software, digital cameras, electronic equipment, TVs,
videos, hi-fi equipment, mobile phones, printer cartridges and copiers. BUT
printer ink and toner cartridges can be recycled via Cartridges 4 Planet Ark,
co-sponsored by many large business organisations. Drop them at participating
Australia Post and Officeworks outlets.
See
http://www.recyclingnearyou.com.au/cartridges.html for details.
What Else Can Be Done?
Of course there are socially concerned users, and there are probably many in
Melb PC. As the second-largest computer user group in the world (over 10,000
members), we can make OM voice heard and exert influence. We can do so by
example, and by influencing the views and actions of the public and politicians.
We can demand that concerted action be taken soon to reduce E-Waste.
Here are some suggestions:
- Education, starting with our own members (this article is a beginning, I hope)
- Drive community participation: publicise responsible computer ownership eg. at Swap Meets and User Group Monthly meetings
- Encourage sustainable consumption – don't upgrade unless you need it (And don't buy a powerful computer for which you have no use)
- Express an opinion — add our voice to demands for action
- Conduct a survey of members and convey the result to Government
- Start an e-mail petition seeking concerted action by all parties
- Write letters, contact your local State and Federal Members of Parliament
- Request information on what is being done about E-waste
- Encourage new initiatives like Byteback or start co-operative partnerships
(our ComputerAid SIG is an example of one with Business To Community Recyclers
(B2C) and World Vision)
- Ask your local council to investigate a scheme similar to Byteback
Anyone with an interest in this matter is invited to contact the author,
m_mullerworth@hotmail.com
Reprinted from the December 2005 issue of PC Update, the magazine of Melbourne PC User Group, Australia
|