Many and, I suspect, a rapidly growing number of users do not distinguish between the Internet and the World Wide Web. Indeed, they may not even be aware that the term, Web, is an abbreviation. The Internet is no longer a marble pillar'd library in what the ignorati call cyberspace. It is a dump, mostly of garbage, but in which precious gems of knowledge and even wisdom may be found. One of the great inventions of our age has been the search engine that enables those who seek porn to find it, and those who seek pearls to find them without having to rummage through an overlay of rubbish. Searching The dictionary meaning of 'to search' is: "To go about (a country or place) in order to find, or to ascertain the presence or absence of some person or thing; to explore in quest of some object" [OED); in ordinary parlance, to look for something. All mammals look for food, shelter, and sex; those that fail in their search don't survive for long enough to pass on their genes. Many exhibit a sense of curiosity that leads them to search for things that don't meet their immediate need for survival; just as dogs go fossicking and dig holes in search of who knows what, many humans also fossick on the Internet just for the sake of it. Early humans learned how to store data as pictures and symbols, and later as written records, that gave them the ability to search for and to communicate knowledge. The development of sophisticated writing systems enabled more formal records to be made, and as the corpus of recorded information expanded so did the means of storing it in order to find particular pieces of it on demand. Librarians still form what is arguably the most efficient class of 'finders'; many people may search, but a librarian is most likely to find. Even computer-based information retrieval systems rely on human design and human input; a skilled searcher will get faster and better results than one who doesn't understand the search process. The Internet is perceived by some as a quantum leap in the way we search for information. It was not a single startling scientific discovery; the Internet was built on the ideas of, and work done by, many people. Paul Baran and Donald Davies independently invented packet switching, without which the system would not work. Vannevar Bush conceived what Doug Engelbart later developed and Ted Nelson named hypertext, an essential ingredient in Tim Berners-Lee's World Wide Web. Modern search engines are a logical extension of what has gone before and are a response to the huge and growing base of publicly available material. Their respective developers may not say so, but complex search engines are also a necessary response to the mountain of garbage that litters the Internet. The art is to make an intelligent guess of what users are looking for, to filter out the garbage, and to present meaningful search results in some order of relevance. An added complexity is that many users are less than competent when it comes to searching. The other side of the search coin is findability, a recently coined noun derived, logically, from findable. If a document, in the widest sense of the term, is not adequately labelled or described it is less likely to be found. Authors and Web publishers need to understand how search engines operate in order to make their work findable. Ambient Findability Finding anything one's way, where one left the car keys, or information involves human behaviour, a factor that I can't recollect having seen discussed in books about Web search engines; that is, with the exception of Ambient Findability. The author, Peter Morville, ranks high amongst information architects and is a co-author of what I consider to be the best single text on information architecture (IA): Information Architecture for the World Wide Web. In Ambient Findability he turns his attention to 'findability', taking the reader on a fascinating journey in which search-related technologies are shown in a new light. This is a book of great insights; the author does not engage in a pedagogical discourse the law according to Morville but puts forward his views and thoughts for consideration. This is a text for people with a sense of curiosity, especially those who want to be intelligently informed on the subject of information retrieval and making information more readily found especially on the Web. It is both philosophical and technical, ranging over many topics including: information literacy; information interaction; human wayfinding; location-sensing devices; maps and charts; artificial intelligence; push and pull; search engine marketing, and defining the terms 'information', 'data', and 'knowledge'. Even though not fully satisfied with the book's 'working definitions' I was pleased to see someone discuss the subject so lucidly. The Oxford English Dictionary devotes over 5800 words to 'information'; its meaning varies with context, information can be and often is false, and politicians often claim to "have no information". When Claude Shannon coined (1948) the term, information theory, 'information' meant something quite different from its use in information science, information systems, or the amorphous information technology. There is a specific computer-context meaning for data: "The quantities, characters, or symbols on which operations are performed by computers and other automatic equipment, and which may be stored or transmitted in the form of electrical signals, records on magnetic tape or punched cards, etc." ]OED]. If you want to pick up some superior words, read this book. That's not intended as a criticism, or a sly dig at the author's writing; he is very careful with his words and does not leave his readers to the mercies of a dictionary. Anyone with an interest in writing should study Peter Morville's book; it is among the best examples I have seen of technical communication. There is no 'dumbing-down', or glossing over difficult concepts, and he manages to maintain a conversational style that is most engaging. It is a great read. The last chapter contains a fascinating discussion of artificial Intelligence. For professionals in the fields of Web design, information architecture, or search engine marketing it is a remarkable source of insights, and of material especially quotes for use in presentations and proposals to clients and management. A text worth a place on reading lists r just about any tertiary course.
Information Architecture
On
the dust jacket of Wurman and Bradford, eds.: Information Architects (Graphis
Press, 1996, ISBN 3-85709-458-3), 'information architect' is defined thus:
A feature of the book that impressed me is the care taken to explain terms and
concepts. For example, granularity crops up in various computer science texts
(especially to do with data compression); in this book it is defined. There is
even a section entitled Technical Lingo. Readers don't need a degree in computer
science to appreciate IA and this title does not assume any special background.
Indeed, the authors make the point, "search is not an IT thing", and go on to
say that " ... ultimately search is here for users, and it's the responsibility
of the information architect to advocate for users. An information architect
will typically understand more [than an IT specialist] about how a search engine
might benefit users by leveraging Metadata or how it should be integrated with
browsing ... ". If you are thinking of an IA career this book is the best
introduction I have seen. The Search
Reprinted from the July 2006 issue of PC Update, the magazine of Melbourne PC User Group, Australia
|